Current:Home > StocksStanding Rock: Tribes File Last-Ditch Effort to Block Dakota Pipeline-LoTradeCoin
Standing Rock: Tribes File Last-Ditch Effort to Block Dakota Pipeline
View Date:2024-12-24 10:41:02
This story was updated at 2.00 a.m. ET on February 16, 2017 to reflect news events.
Native American tribes have filed yet another legal motion seeking to halt construction of the Dakota Access pipeline. Legal experts said the attempt faces long odds but may be the tribes’ best hope for blocking the project.
The motion, filed Tuesday by the Standing Rock and Cheyenne River Sioux tribes, asks the court to reverse an easement for the pipeline that the Army Corps of Engineers granted. That easement lifted the final hurdle for the project’s completion.
The tribes said the Corps’ actions violate the National Environmental Policy Act and the Corps’ responsibility to protect the tribes’ treaty rights. They called the decision “arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law.”
The move is the latest in a long and twisting legal battle and protest movement to block the project’s Missouri River crossing under Lake Oahe, which skirts the Standing Rock Sioux reservation. The tribe says the pipeline threatens its water supply and sacred sites. In the final weeks of the Obama administration, the Army Corps declined to issue the final easement for the pipeline, saying it would conduct an environmental impact statement and would consider rerouting the pipeline.
One of Donald Trump’s first actions as president, however, was to order a reversal of the decision and swift approval of the project. Last week, the Corps issued the easement for the Lake Oahe crossing without producing an impact statement. The pipeline now may be just weeks away from completion.
The tribes have had little success in their legal attempts to block construction, said Patrick A. Parenteau, a professor at Vermont Law School.
“It’s already knocked them back a few times. It’s never a good sign when you keep losing,” he said. But Parenteau said the motion contains the best arguments the tribes have put forward.
“The strongest possible argument is that the Trump administration, with no change in facts, no change in conditions, reversed the government’s position,” he said. “As the federal government, you told this court in December you had a legal obligation to do a full environmental impact statement. Now you’re telling me you don’t. Why?”
Courts generally grant agencies substantial deference on how to proceed under the environmental policy act, said Wayne J. D’Angelo, an energy and environmental lawyer with Kelley, Drye & Warren, which makes the tribes’ argument unlikely to succeed. “They’re throwing everything against the wall,” he said. “The filing reflects the last of the plaintiffs’ actions for court intervention here.”
The tribes’ best hope may be that the Corps gave no substantive explanation for why it reversed itself, said Keith Benes, a former State Department lawyer who’s now a consultant and a fellow at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy. “Courts say an agency can change their mind about something, but courts also say that an agency has to give a reason,” he said. “By doing what it did, the Army really strengthened the case that the tribes had.”
On Monday, a federal district judge denied a separate attempt by the Cheyenne River Sioux to grant a temporary restraining order after the tribe argued the pipeline could pollute water that it uses in religious ceremonies. While the judge decided not to halt construction, that case will proceed and the judge said he would rule on the merits of the challenge before oil begins to flow.
The pipeline, which is being built by Energy Transfer Partners, has triggered ongoing protests led by tribal groups. While most demonstrators have left the site of the main protest encampment in North Dakota, a few hundred remain. Earlier this month, the Corps told tribal leaders that it would begin clearing the protest site because of safety concerns and the risk of floods. This week, as warm temperatures have prompted rapid snowmelt, state officials warned that flooding could contaminate nearby rivers with garbage and waste that protesters have left behind. On Wednesday, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum ordered protesters to vacate the federal land by Feb. 22.
The easement being protested would cover a short section of the pipeline, most of which has already been constructed. This week’s filing represents one of the tribe’s last options for blocking the project. A ruling is expected quickly, but could be appealed.
D’Angelo said that while he expects the judge to deny the motion, there’s little legal precedent for how and when a new administration can shift course on a decision like this.
“There’s not a ton of case law out there on it,” he said. “I think how courts view these policy shifts back and forth is interesting, and this is an important issue.”
veryGood! (5499)
Related
- Gigi Hadid and Bradley Cooper Prove They're Going Strong With Twinning Looks on NYC Date
- Jennifer Lawrence Reveals Which Movie of Hers She Wants to Show Her Baby Boy Cy
- Chicago program helps young people find purpose through classic car restoration
- A New Study Closes the Case on the Mysterious Rise of a Climate Super-Pollutant
- Chiefs block last-second field goal to save unbeaten record, beat Broncos
- Naomi Watts Marries Billy Crudup: See the Couple's Adorable Wedding Photo
- America’s Energy Future: What the Government Misses in Its Energy Outlook and Why It Matters
- Brian Austin Green Slams Claim Ex Megan Fox Forces Sons to Wear Girls Clothes
- Harriet Tubman posthumously named a general in Veterans Day ceremony
- Rural Jobs: A Big Reason Midwest Should Love Clean Energy
Ranking
- Avril Lavigne’s Ex Mod Sun Is Dating Love Is Blind Star Brittany Wisniewski, Debuts Romance With a Kiss
- Warming Trends: Airports Underwater, David Pogue’s New Book and a Summer Olympic Bid by the Coldest Place in Finland
- In Two Opposite Decisions on Alaska Oil Drilling, Biden Walks a Difficult Path in Search of Bipartisanship
- Man found dead in car with 2 flat tires at Death Valley National Park amid extreme heat
- Natural gas flares sparked 2 wildfires in North Dakota, state agency says
- 5 Seconds of Summer Guitarist Michael Clifford Expecting First Baby With Wife Crystal Leigh
- The Radical Case for Growing Huge Swaths of Bamboo in North America
- Khloe Kardashian Gives Update on Nickname for Her Baby Boy Tatum
Recommendation
-
Nevada trial set for ‘Dances with Wolves’ actor in newly-revived sex abuse case
-
Fossil Fuels on Trial: Where the Major Climate Change Lawsuits Stand Today
-
100% Renewable Energy Needs Lots of Storage. This Polar Vortex Test Showed How Much.
-
U.S. Solar Jobs Fell with Trump’s Tariffs, But These States Are Adding More
-
Taylor Swift drops Christmas merchandise collection, including for 'Tortured Poets' era
-
Pills laced with fentanyl killed Leandro De Niro-Rodriguez, Robert De Niro's grandson, mother says
-
New Report: Climate Change and Biodiversity Loss Must Be Tackled Together, Not Separately
-
How 12 Communities Are Fighting Climate Change and What’s Standing in Their Way